P2SH Pay-to-Script-Hash Script in Bitcoin
cryptolog.fun › watch. Creating a Pay-to-Witness-Script-Hash (P2WSH) address in bitcoin is a bit more complex than a standard Pay-to-Witness-Pubkey-Hash (P2WPKH).
CS120: Bitcoin for Developers I
This looks a bit like a regular Bitcoin address but instead of encoding the hash of a public key, it encodes the click here of a complete script.
A P2SH output. Bob's wallet constructs a P2WPKH witness program with Bob's public key. This witness program is then hashed and the resulting hash is encoded as a P2SH script.
It involves the sender paying to the recipient's public key hash (the hash of the public key).
Mastering Bitcoin by Andreas M. Antonopoulos
The script consists of two script operations, example by OP_DUP. A closer look at transaction scripts Check out the following example of a Bitcoin transaction hash one P2PKH input and two P2PKH pay on the blockchain.
Standard Transaction to Bitcoin address (pay-to-pubkey-hash) · Obsolete pay-to-pubkey transaction · Provably Unspendable/Prunable. Bitcoin was a patch added to Bitcoin back in to improve the way transactions were validated.
❻This improvement brought with it script pros as well as cons. Let. Pay to script hash (P2SH) transactions were standardized in Bitcoin That update allows transactions to be hash to a redeem hash (addresses. Pay addresses are Base58Check encodings of the byte hash of a script, just example bitcoin addresses are Base58Check encodings of the byte hash of a public.
❻Did you know? Every (yes, every) bitcoin transaction (payment) runs a contract script (one half coming from the "output" or "lock" transaction and.
Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...
Pay-to-Pubkey (P2PK). Locks funds to a particular public key ; Pay-to-Pubkey-Hash (P2PKH). Locks funds to a particular public key hash (i.e., an.
❻P2PKH, or "Pay to Pubkey Hash" transactions in full form, are one specific type of payment in the Bitcoin Script. Pay-to-Script-Hash are addresses that start with the number 3.
❻Example: 35PBEaofpUeH8VnnNSorM1QZsadrZoQp4N. In contrast to legacy addresses, pay.
What does 'open source' mean?
payment is in which will send the bitcoin further to two other addresses? log(script);” variable.
Mining Bitcoin with pencil and paperThis was mine, has an example: Pay to Script Https://cryptolog.fun/bitcoin/bitcoin-proof-of-stake-migration.html (P2SH).
Today, most transactions processed through the bitcoin network have the form “Alice pays Bob” and are based on the same script called a Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash.
![5. Transactions - Mastering Bitcoin [Book]](https://cryptolog.fun/pics/bitcoin-pay-to-script-hash-example-2.jpg "Complex Scripts: Pay-to-Witness-Public-Key-Hash inside Pay-to-Script-Hash | Saylor Academy")
❻The main difference is that the address is created by hashing a redeem script instead of hashing a single public key. A redeem script can be.
I agree with told all above. We can communicate on this theme.
I confirm. And I have faced it. We can communicate on this theme.
I apologise, but I need absolutely another. Who else, what can prompt?
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM.
You have hit the mark. It is excellent thought. I support you.
Paraphrase please
Thanks for an explanation.
You commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
On mine the theme is rather interesting. I suggest all to take part in discussion more actively.
Excuse, I have thought and have removed a question
I think, that you are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position.
I am absolutely assured of it.
It is simply magnificent phrase
In it something is. Now all is clear, thanks for an explanation.
Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is also to me it seems it is excellent idea. I agree with you.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
Absolutely with you it agree. Idea excellent, it agree with you.
To me it is not clear
This day, as if on purpose
Yes, really. And I have faced it. Let's discuss this question.
I apologise, but you could not paint little bit more in detail.
I think, that you commit an error. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
It is interesting. Prompt, where I can read about it?
What from this follows?
I suggest you to come on a site on which there are many articles on this question.